Lawsuit Abuse: It’s amazing that a decade or more into the Internet age there are still companies that believe the best way to respond to a chat room criticism is via a lawsuit. Still, it’s understandable when lawyers do it. Lawsuits are a medium they understand, and no one expects them to know anything about protecting a corporate reputation.
But when it comes from a PR professional—as this missive to Canadian journalist, sci-fi writer and blogger Cory Doctorow did—it’s hard to understand. If “Dennis Zhidkov" really is a PR manager for Star-Force, Inc., it’s hard to imagine that he saw no other way to deal with Doctorow’s criticism of his company’s products except to threaten him with legal action.
Perhaps Zhidkov thought he was dealing with a nervous nine year old, because his hyperbolic attack—“your article violates approximately 11 international laws. Our U.S. lawyer will contact you shortly. I have also contacted the FBI , because what you are doing is harassment”—is so over the top the only possible reaction an adult could have is hysterical giggles.
McDonald’s learned the hard way that when you threaten (or worse still take) legal action against your critics, you not only amplify the original criticism, guaranteeing a wider audience and enhanced credibility, you damage your own reputation, because no one loves a bully, even if he happens to be right on the facts. That’s doubly true in the online world, where free speech is a prized commodity and any attempt to stifle discussion is an offense even to those who might otherwise agree with you.
I have no idea whether Star-Force products are as bad as Doctorow says. I do know, thanks to Zhidkov, it's not the kind of company I would want to do business with.
But when it comes from a PR professional—as this missive to Canadian journalist, sci-fi writer and blogger Cory Doctorow did—it’s hard to understand. If “Dennis Zhidkov" really is a PR manager for Star-Force, Inc., it’s hard to imagine that he saw no other way to deal with Doctorow’s criticism of his company’s products except to threaten him with legal action.
Perhaps Zhidkov thought he was dealing with a nervous nine year old, because his hyperbolic attack—“your article violates approximately 11 international laws. Our U.S. lawyer will contact you shortly. I have also contacted the FBI , because what you are doing is harassment”—is so over the top the only possible reaction an adult could have is hysterical giggles.
McDonald’s learned the hard way that when you threaten (or worse still take) legal action against your critics, you not only amplify the original criticism, guaranteeing a wider audience and enhanced credibility, you damage your own reputation, because no one loves a bully, even if he happens to be right on the facts. That’s doubly true in the online world, where free speech is a prized commodity and any attempt to stifle discussion is an offense even to those who might otherwise agree with you.
I have no idea whether Star-Force products are as bad as Doctorow says. I do know, thanks to Zhidkov, it's not the kind of company I would want to do business with.
1 Comments:
At 5:10 AM, thesis writing service said…
Here at Sick of Lawsuits we are sparkling a light on how claim mishandle influences purchasers, citizens, private ventures, entrepreneurs, and the general economy. Injurious claims genuinely cost every one of us – they hurt the economy, smother work creation, undermine our entrance to reasonable, quality social insurance, and defer equity for the really harmed by stopping up our courts.
Post a Comment
<< Home